General question

at the reading of one hochzeitsthread me fell just the 5000 photos in the eye, the someone on a wedding has fired.
now I got thinking about times so as it is with me and was also formerly... you had a 36ér film, it was weighed whether it makes sense to shoot a photo of this or that situation, 4-5 in series that could not even be gabs speech missed shots that were sorted out immediately etc.
When the digital photography came up I thought to myself "man large class - now you photograph much less and sort out all bad photos and keep only the very big things".


Today, with a little distance from I however admit that I do vieeeeeel more photos than I originally time had made me, that I as well as separate from any photo can - are only the worst jerk no time cleared me - my hard drive bursts from almost all seams, as not sort out also regularly helps. AFTER
well, now I was wondering just how you with the many photos which you so day to day makes. do you have the same problems to separate you from something? If not, after which exclusion proceedings are you working (maybe I can watch Yes there what off to me * grins *), let you print the best photos on paper and then separates you from most of the photos on the plate or on dvd/cd burning you mercilessly?
and also if you e.g. on celebrations for photos with friends makes — procedure chooses you after which?

eager am reply.

LG,
Antje

PS: * hope * that the thread is not closed but I'm not paying member * duck * and come in the members talk in so please do not scold net because I'm in the wrong forum. We call the creative thread even after deleting photos

Hi Antje,.
You're... exactly for this in the wrong forum the Forum one above it opened... for freemember readable and more generally held...

I was in the 500-5,000 wedding pictures thread already verewigt...ich which even didn't.

We calculate it once... 5,000 recordings on 36 KB-film are about 138 movies... the film zu...keine idea, say Let's 2 euro? Are already around 275,-euros.
Time around 500 euro makes so 2 euro develop the 138 rolls... each... to be at the same level as digital, so to have a negative...
The rest is then quite similar...

But away from wedding photography... If I'm so for me I am little exposures still as as analog. Last pull off, three-quarter day - 17 pictures exposed... 14 evening on the PC 3 heart deleted, closed...

But it has grabbed me even when the dog taking pictures, because I did calm me even I a Digi in the hand I and 2 GB memory card... on serial mode and durchgedrückt...Hach... great!
Result - 85 pictures in the evening 82 deleted and closed three in the heart...
A blessing intended for action to neglect for so continued still subjects like mine. But a nice feeling - you could, if you wanted to.

I delete all what I don't like. I give all clothes away that I had a year of not... which I liked by lifting up not better, the pixel monsters also not. On the contrary, an image that I now find garbage will be a year rather worse, because I am so hopefully moving...

Luminance, etc.

Yes. It is possible. Very coarse.
Quote
"A very rough Lux photo album design measurement is possible with the SLR (NEDCC): camera setting 800 ASA and 1/60 sec a 35 mm lens is set 30-40 cm on a white board." The aperture is adjusted until the camera shows a correct exposure. "Then 50 lux, Aperture is f/4 5.6 = 100 lux, Aperture 8 = 200 lux, etc."
Quote from


Especially this quote might be interesting:
"The luminance depends on not only the illuminance and the single-beam angle of the light off but also by the reflectance of the surface (if the surface is black or white). A dark painting required therefore stronger lighting, so that we can recognize it well."

On this site, there are also all kinds of formulas that you can maybe help.

What does Bella is face of skills also, current cameras, makes sense.

Hi, Bella.
Thank you for your first very helpful answer. I'm not the photo but to a cheap and for each viable rough Lux measurement. Hence no 18% gray box, because the back no one has at home ;-)

Thanks for the reply and the link. There is only a bottom line, not as Lux now however the calculation - camera exposure generally behaves. I rummage me but time through the citations, sounds at first glance quite bauchbar.

Would be happy about more ideas. Also links or references to the literature.

for a rough "Lux measurement >" so lighting strength measurement does hold the camera - as has been explained already.
I take to my light meter, and the conversion calculator.
A "Schätzeisen" for various measurements (voltage think 2A, noise and light intensity up to 400V, power up I...) there were less than €50 once at Lidl, so one I have me put to, good for "Treasure measurements" enough.

TO the degrees of the reflection of "white" paper: Ca 85 to 92% the deviation is therefore quite large. It more accurately is measured on a gray card.
Return expect directly from the exposure metering (spot goes there) on the grey card on there incident illuminance. Note that it is "normal illuminance on the grey card, so you must place the card horizontally for horizontal illuminance or vertically for vertical illuminance. Important: The camera should nevertheless, ca 90 ° to the measuring plane '' look '' otherwise it comes through the reflection behavior of various grey cards to materially.
Only the direct metering allows an exact lighting level measurement, as only the direct measurement of luminance is the actual "brightness" that conversion of illuminance without exact reflection Indicatrix (3-D reflection curve for an angle of incidence, for multiple incidence angle are appropriately taken into account several) any calculation is only an approximation